A HYBRID INTEROPERABILITY MODEL FOR VILLAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: ADAPTIVE DIGITAL GOVERNANCE IN RURAL AREAS OF GARUT REGENCY, INDONESIA

Authors

  • Zulkifli Adnan Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Garut University
  • Abdullah Ramdhani Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Garut University
  • Hasbi Shiddiq Fauzan Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Garut University
  • Jumiati Post Graduate Program, Garut University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36624/1jm5pw85

Keywords:

administrative resilience, electronic-based government system (SPBE), institutional coordination, public service continuity, socio-technical systems

Abstract

Digital transformation has become an important component of public sector reform, including at the village level. However, the implementation of Village Information Systems in rural areas continues to face challenges associated with unstable internet connectivity, fragmented administrative applications, limited human capacity, and inconsistent data management. These conditions affect the effectiveness of Electronic-Based Government Systems (SPBE) and hinder the continuity of public services. This study aims to examine digital governance challenges in village administrations and develop a conceptual Hybrid Interoperability Model for Village Information Systems in Garut Regency, Indonesia. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed using semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis involving 19 informants from village governments, district institutions, Diskominfo, and DPMD. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that fragmented systems and infrastructure limitations represent not only technical issues but also institutional challenges that influence administrative performance. In response to these conditions, the study proposes a Hybrid Interoperability Model that emphasizes administrative continuity, institutional coordination, and adaptive digital governance. The study contributes to the literature by reconceptualizing interoperability as a governance mechanism rather than merely a technological function. Practically, the findings provide insights for SPBE implementation and village governance reform in rural contexts characterized by infrastructural uncertainty and unequal digital capacities.

 

References

Adnan, I. Z., Adnan, Z., Fadhlurrohman, M. I., et al. (2024). Implementation of e-government through village information systems: A case study of Talaga Jaya Village, Garut Regency.

Ahmed, S. M. Y., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2025). Semantic interoperability in electronic government: A systematic review.

Akbar, G. G., Muchtar, M., Pundenswari, P., et al. (2025). Mapping poverty alleviation in Garut Regency: Collaboration and actor interaction perspectives.

Blair, G. S., Paolucci, M., Grace, P., et al. (2011). Interoperability in complex distributed systems.

Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17-32.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown University Press.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473.

Geohansa, A. (2025). Digital transformation of village governance in Indonesia.

Kouroubali, A., & Katehakis, D. G. (2019). The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

Malecki, E. J. (2003). Digital development in rural areas: Potentials and pitfalls. Journal of Rural Studies.

Maulany, R. R., & Amiruddin, M. (2022). Problematika penerapan Sistem Informasi Desa di Indonesia.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government Systems.

Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.

Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review. Journal of Rural Studies.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334-340.

Sulistyowati, et al. (2021). SPBE implementation and digital governance challenges in Indonesian local governments.

Yaacoub, E., & Alouini, M. S. (2020). Connecting the base of the pyramid: A survey on rural connectivity. Proceedings of the IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21

How to Cite

A HYBRID INTEROPERABILITY MODEL FOR VILLAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: ADAPTIVE DIGITAL GOVERNANCE IN RURAL AREAS OF GARUT REGENCY, INDONESIA. (2026). Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 17(2), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.36624/1jm5pw85

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.